Unfortunately there are places in the world where oil spills are common place and sometimes intentional they are either hidden behind politics or just ignored because the public have grown accustomed to them.
With the greed of a few this will probably continue until there is no more oil to exploit.
Maybe if more people in the world know more about this sort of thing then it can change for the better.
The Former Soviet Union
When BP spilt 4.9 million barrels of oil into the Gulf of Mexico in 2010, the whole world took notice. The Russian oil industry spills more than 30 million barrels on land each year — seven times the amount that escaped during the Deepwater Horizon disaster — often under a veil of secrecy and corruption. And every 18 months, more than four million barrels spews into the Arctic Ocean, where it becomes everyone's problem.
Komi district, FSU
Important oil discoveries have been made in the Pechora basin. In 1976 oil production from the Pechora basin totaled about 175,000 barrels per day comprising nearly 2% of the national production of the USSR. There is a oil pipeline running southwards from the town of Usinsk to Ukhta and onwards towards to Moscow.
Komineft, the company responsible for this old pipeline system, has a history of accidents caused by aging and corroded pipelines, they experience hundreds of leaks and ruptures each year, the ground is saturated with oil. Some of the oil has seeped into the water table.
One of the main reasons for the large oil spills is the money made from the oil which drives officials to strain the antiquated infrastructure and to keep it moving despite breakdowns.
I took the photo's left on a visit to the region. This is one of hundreds of leaks across the region. The 90º bend is welded so with huge temperature differences during the year the pipe expands and contracts until it breaks. That is why in other parts of the world expansion loops photo right are put in the line to allow for these fluctuations.
The pipeline just south of the
spread over this sensitive area.
Approx. 102,000m3 of oil began to run over this highly sensitive taiga area (Exxon Valdez was approx 35,000m3).
Some of this released oil flowed into the Kolva river a tributary of the Usa which, shortly after the confluence, flows into the Pechora River. The Pechora river is one of the main rivers of the European Arctic, rising at the northern end of the Ural Mountains and flowing into the southern Barents Sea through a large delta at the town of Nar'yan Mar (population 20,000). To the west side of the delta, extending along the Russki Zavarot Peninsula, lies the Nenetsky Nature Park. The Pechora River supports a large population of migratory salmon and char and fishing is one of the main industries of Nar'yan Mar. Statistics for 1975 showed that 1 million people lived in the Komi and 40 thousand in the Nenetsky region.
The Barents Sea lies to the north of European Russia, bounded to the east by the island of Novaya Zemlya. The Pechora River flows into the Pechorskoye Sea at its south-eastern corner. There are major commercial fisheries in the Barents Sea and some fish stocks are migratory, being shared with northern Norway. Large colonies of breeding seabirds are found along the coasts, particularly of Novaya Zemlya. The Pechorskoye Sea is usually ice-free until late December and supports large concentrations of sea duck. Marine mammals are also found in substantial numbers, notably the Beluga or White Whale, Ringed Seal, Bearded Seal and Polar Bear.
Most of the oil spread over an area of approx 187km2. at a time when weather conditions helped the containment and some was recovered the rest proceeded to freeze during the winter months.
The main concern was the next spring thaw, which threatened to release much of the remaining oil into the rivers again. The Kolva and Usa river feeds into the Pechora river which contains large amounts of salmon, char and other valuable fish species. Teams built or reinforced enormous dams and constructed massive earthworks to hold oil laden flood waters back.
The structure of the top soil in this area differs greatly from site to site. In some places it is a peat bed with the mosses growing on the top, there is a permafrost which even during the summer is approx. 1 meter below the surface. In other areas the bed rock is very close to the surface with a fine layer of sand and the peat on top, in these areas the weight of the oil during the spring thaw slid the moss and sand off the rock, this meant that the oil now was mixed with this organic matter and could not be pumped back into the pipeline, so it was put into huge storage pits and set on fire, these pits burned for a couple of weeks they were filled again and the process repeated.
As a part of the clean up operation over the next six months, the oil was deliberately set on fire in different areas in order reduce the quantities that could spread as a result of the warmer temperatures. The smoke plume rose more than 8,000 feet and extended beyond the horizon some 40 miles away.
With low temperatures, oil tends to persist for long periods of time because of the low evaporation rates. The frozen ground prevents the oil from seeping into it, and this allows it to spread over large areas. In addition, disturbance to the thin layer of vegetation covering a frozen soil can precipitate a catastrophic and extensive erosion. The effects remain visible for many years. For example, it can take decades for a tree to grow one meter, and tyre tracks in tundra vegetation can remain for up to 100 years.
Birch and Spruce trees growing in the area looked as if they were smothered with thick black shoe polish. Nearby lakes are resting grounds for migrating mallard ducks. There are many species that were likely to be affected by this spill.
This region has one of the largest herds of domestic reindeer, estimated between 65,000-120,000 in the 1980's. Tundra environments are characterised by rich lichen communities which are susceptible to crude oil which they absorb very quickly. Reindeer are entirely dependent on lichen and are therefore were likely to be severely impacted. Commercial reindeer herding is one of the major industries in the Komi Republic. The Pechorskoye sea within the Barents sea holds some of the largest concentrations of white whales. There were also a number of birds and freshwater fish species that are could have been at risk.
Komineft was fined $600,000 for its pipeline spill. Although the company is unable to pay much of that sum because of its severe financial problems, it did give each resident of Ust-Usa 36,000 rubles about $7 in compensation.
Greenpeace were given an invite to go to the area, they were horrified by what they saw and due to their reports of the damage done and so international money was asked for to accelerate the clean up. This case was handled by the Russian government in terms of cleaning up the oil. The European Bank for Reconstruction and Development lent the clean-up operation $25 million and the World Bank provided $100 million. From a cynical point of view most of it disappeared due to the level of corruption and other powerful organisations. Greenpeace were not invited back probably because they had served their purpose.
The attitude is very much 'so what?' spills are the norm rather than the exception in the Former Soviet Union. You can see damage like this all over Siberia and down to the borders with Iran. Just because someone happened to notice some oil floating down the river a couple of days ago, it suddenly makes the headlines, but the sad fact is it is not unusual.
Local villagers have suffered for years from the effects of petroleum pollution from the many oil spills in the region. Most natives are worried about the fish living in the Kolva river. The river used to have lots of fish, now there are hardly any and when we cook them they smell bad, people here survive but they are worried about their future.
I visited the area in June 1996 the clean up had finished but you would not have guessed, on the drive north past the spill area and past the
I was driven around the area which was obviously beautiful before the oil, birch and small spruce trees, lakes, rivers and the different species of moss. Unfortunately the lakes were covered in rainbow sheens the trees just trunks and the smell of crude oil everywhere.
The photographs with booms and skimmers as well as the fires were taken during the spill clean up, the other oil on the ground ones were taken during my visit. The first photo is just one of hundreds of leaking pipelines across the region. It is quite impressive how man and his greed for money can destroy such a beautiful area with little or no thought. Having said that the people who gain the money do not live in the area and probably have never been there.
This area can be seen on Google Earth at (latitude 66°.102400 longtitude 57.100988).
15 years later the area has rock above the surface and no sign of the living mosses that can be seen as in areas near by.
Money is spent but not on infrastucture!
Sept. 10, 2011 photos below show dying trees next to an oil spill near the town of Usinsk, 1500 kilometers (930 miles) northeast of Moscow. Komi is one of Russia's largest and oldest oil provinces but ruptures in aging pipelines and leaks from decommissioned oil wells make oil spills in the region routine. Environmentalists estimate at least 5 million tons (35 million barrels), is spilled every year. That's equivalent to one Deepwater Horizon-scale leak about every two months. Crumbling infrastructure and a harsh climate combine to spell disaster in the world's largest oil producer, responsible for 13 percent of global output. (AP Photo/Dmitry Lovetsky)
Read more: Fairbanks Daily News-Miner - Russia oil spills wreak devastation in far north
Here is an aerial photo of the area around Usinsk during the summer showing the lakes and bog land that is being destroyed by oil spills that mostly are not cleaned up.
Who would want to stop the money being generated for the rich few by shutting down the system to make repairs.
It didnt happen during the communist era and will not happen now the political scene has turned democratic!
We are looking at demonstrations over the move by the USA to explore more in the Arctic region of Alaska.
It has to be said that the regulations there will be better than in the Russian Arctic where exploration has started. I dont see many demonstration happening in this part of the world.
The next question is will the oil field practices and atitudes of the last 40 years change? The answer is probably not.
Response to oil spills on land are much easier than in ice cover seas. Photo left shows a Russian tanker at a loading point in a frozen sea, to get there the tanker needs to break the ice. This is a new generation of ice breaking tanker.
Khanty-Mansiysk district, Siberia
I am not the biggest fan of Greenpeace or of their methods over the years but I have to say they are the only organisation that is willing to show the problems in the FSU do not get any better even with foreign investment.
This is the latest in the oil spill saga, this time at the Mamontovskoe and Yuzhno-Balyksky oil fields, owned by Rosneft in the Khanty-Mansiysk district, Siberia.
Greenpeace claims this is simply the daily routine of this oil giant that is now rushing to exploit the arctic. Instead of replacing its leaky, rusty pipes in Siberia, it plans to invest billions of dollars into arctic shelf exploration.
The operations have turned thousands of hectares of forest into environmental disaster zones in just a matter of years,
Baku, Azerbaijan, FSU
A brief history of the place will allow you to understand that the population has been used to the smell of crude oil on the ground for over one hundred years so its not new, it is common place. The existence of petroleum has been known since the 8th century. In the 10th century, an Arabian traveler reported that both white and black oil were being extracted naturally in Baku. By the 15th century oil for lamps was obtained from hand dug surface wells. First oil well was drilled in Baku in 1846. The Bolshevik revolution started in 1905 and ran through World War I. In 1918 Baku came under the control of Bolshevik's who inspired and condoned civil warfare in and around Baku. during this period the oil field were set on fire.
Large-scale oil development started in 1872, when the Russian imperial authorities auctioned the parcels of oil-rich land around Baku to private investors. Within a short period of time Various European and American investors arrived in Baku, among them the drilling companies were the Nobel brothers and Rothschild to name but two, the industrial oil area, known as the Black City, which was established in the outskirts of the city. By the beginning of the 20th century the oil fields were the largest in the world. The revolution and civil unrest led to both Rothschild and the Nobel brothers leaving Baku.
The photograph above shows the oil was pumped into reservoirs which was the start of the pollution which still plagues the area today.
The photograph on the right shows an oil well being dug by hand in Azerbaijan during these early days the oil was very close to the surface.
These black and white photographs were taken from the site address mentioned below where an excellent chronology of the oil era up to the Soviet period can be found.
Other information can be found with searches at azer.com
By 1900 the city had more than 3,000 oil wells of which 2,000 were producing oil at industrial levels. Baku ranked as one of the largest centres for the production of oil industry equipment before World War II. During World War II while battle of Stalingrad was fought at the same time as a push was made to control the Baku oil fields the push failed. Fifty years before, Baku produced half of the world's oil supply.
At the end of the 20th century much of the onshore petroleum had been exhausted, and drilling was extended into the Caspian sea.
At the end of the 1940s the construction of the “Oil Rocks” (“Neft Dashlari”) started. On November 14, 1948 the group of oil workers landed on a group of rocks in the open sea 42 km to the south-east of the Apsheron Peninsular called “Gara Dashlar” (“Black Rocks”). After finishing the construction of a small house on piles and an electric power station, they started drilling the first well and on June 24, 1949. On
There were times when the length of the pier connecting the numerous areas reached 300 km. In the open sea 110 km off Baku electric power stations, five and even nine-storey buildings including hostels, hospitals, palaces of culture, bakeries and a lemonade factory were constructed, a park with trees was laid out too. Since 1949 there have been 1940 wells drilled, more than 160 million tons of oil and 12 billion cubic metres of gas have been extracted.
The Oil Rocks are the furthest eastern settlement in the country. The facility is poorly maintained, with miles of roads now under the sea. The waterline is at the second-floor windows of some worker's dormitories. Although one-third of the Oil Rocks complex’s 600 wells are inoperable or inaccessible, operations have continued without a significant increase in investment.
Several action sequences in the 1999 James Bond film The World Is Not Enough are set on the Oil Rocks. Today more than 2000 people work there.
The position on Google Earth for this strange place is (latitude 40°17' 42.42'' N Longtitude 50°01' 00.45'' E)
There was a delegation of Azeries who visited an oil field in Dorset, England in the 1990's they did not believe there was oil production there because they could not smell it or see it.
A BP company representative said the difference in the UK is that if you could see or smell it the oil field would be closed down.
I took these onshore photographs one Saturday in the early 90's, I could go back tomorrow and take the same ones again. As I said previously approx. 20% of production is on or worse still in the ground. These photographs explain very vividly this fact. This oilfield belongs to the State of Azerbaijan oil company SOCAR so it is alright. Foreign oil companies are fined heavily if they have spills. The main export pipelines from here to the Black sea and Southern Turkey were constructed and paid for by the Foreign oil companies and are built to Western standards.
Unfortunately the old original ones still continue to leak. I guess if this area is ever to be cleaned up it will take Western money but what is the point when the pollution will just continue, it is part of the culture of the city, to smell crude oil is normal, the population has known nothing else for generations.
In 2006 the world bank's representatives had talks with President Ilham Aliyev and other officials about a multi-million-dollar project to clean an area roughly the size of
The clean up would focus on oil-soaked areas in the Absheron peninsula, Azerbaijan's most densely populated region and location of the capital Baku. A clean-up of this size hasn't been undertaken anywhere.
The World Bank said it would potentially provide a loan of about 50 million dollars for capacity building and an initial clean-up but also expected funding from the Azeri government, which at the time was earning large profits from the current oil boom.
The photo left is from Greenpeace up in Siberia showing some oil being removed by the blue truck but looking at the soil much of the oil is being covered not removed.
This image is probable not much different to what happened here as the change was very fast.
Bearing in mind that this polution started over a 150 years ago, imagine how deep the polution went into this sandy substrate.
Remediation is not a case of removing the surface oil and covering the rest it is a long term process.
2 years later trees began to die, mainly due to much of the oil being covered by soil not remediated at all.
Google Earth at position (latitude 40°32' 44.21''N Longtitude 49°83' 65.27''E) has satelite images from the past and present, they show the changes taking place and will show them in the future.
Azerbaijani state oil company SOCAR's Ecology Department has prepared a draft plan for the prevention and mitigation of SOCAR oil spills, the company said on Thursday 10th Jan 2013 only 167 years after the first well was drilled.
The Middle East
Lebanon-Jiyye Oil Spill July 2006
It can be difficult trying to clean up a spill when the war is still going on!
Approx.15,000 m3 heavy fuel oil spilled into the Sea. It became one of the largest environmental incidents in Mediterranean history The wind was from the South West and Northerly current pushed the oil spill northwards along the coast of
Sensitive fish spawning and nursery areas as well as valuable sea turtle nesting sites were in one of the affected areas.
The spill could have reached neighbouring countries such as
The impact of the the oil spill caused tremendous negative environmental, social and economical impacts both for the short term and long term. It damaged marine ecosystems, damaged fishermen’s livelihoods and rendered coastal areas lifeless. Heavy fuel oil, is among the most difficult oils to cleanup. Its viscous nature leads to prolonged persistence in the marine environment, such oils have the potential to cause widespread contamination of sensitive environmental and economic resources which will take many years to recover.
The total direct economic cost of this oil spill has been estimated at more than 200 million dollars.
The long term costs are not determined yet and are likely to be much more. Even a month after the attacks oil was still entering the sea. The oil settled deep into the sand, rocks and seabed. Cleanup operations could not start until the ceasefire was enforced. Delaying the start of cleanup operations made this spill harder to clean up. Despite the danger local NGOs, private sector and the Ministry of Environment started to cleanup certain sensitive and highly impacted areas.
The delay caused the highly viscous heavy fuel to solidify; it emulsified with sea water, formed tar balls, lumps or emulsions, settled on the seabed and traveled further along the coast line. This makes clean up efforts and costs of clean up greater and mobility of experts and essential equipment nearly impossible. The absence of a pre-spill contingency plan made the job more difficult to allocate high and low priorities for the cleanup effort.
Local volunteers and a number of environmental activists formed an oil spill working group to follow on this issue and where among the first on the ground. Assessment operations and documentation of the damage started on the 17th of July covering the Lebanese coast from
This was approx 25,000 m3 Exxon Valdez was approx 35,000 m3 which was seen by the whole world and is still talked about today, many people think it was one of the largest tanker spills (it is actually the 35th largest to date). This on the other hand is a spill that hardly anyone knew about. I guess if it was anyone other than Israel this would be classed as environmental terrorism.
It is somewhat ironic that the main backer of Israel, the USA are paying the most towards the cleanup cause by their friends.
The power plant can be found on Google Earth at Latitude 33°64'65.37''N longtitude 35°39'85.50''E.
Unfortunately on the American Google Earth there is no sign of what Israel did, unlike the other places in this section.
Thankfully we still have NASA also an American company who do tell the truth as can be seen at Beirut on the right.
Mikati calls for international tribunal to try Israel for 2006 Lebanon oil spill
June 22, 2012 11:23 AM
The Daily Star
BEIRUT: Prime Minister Najib Mikati called Thursday for the creation of an international environmental tribunal to try Israel for causing the 2006 oil spill on Lebanon’s shoreline, and criticized the Jewish state’s refusal to comply with U.N. resolutions.
“Lebanon proposes establishing an international environmental tribunal following the environmental consequences of the 2006 war – primarily the oil pollution crisis over which Lebanon has not received any compensation from the Israeli enemy,” Mikati said during his speech at the U.N. conference for Sustainable Development in Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.
Mikati was referring to Israel’s bombing of Lebanon’s Jiyyeh power station during the 34-day conflict in July and August of 2006. The bombing caused the power station to release 15,000 tons of unrefined fuel oil into the Mediterranean sea.
In an assessment of the economic damage released a year later, the World Bank estimated Lebanon’s overall losses at being between $527 million and $931 million. The report added that the average of these two figures, $729 million, constitutes 3.6 percent of Lebanon’s gross domestic product in 2006.
The U.N. has repeatedly urged Israel to assume responsibility and provide adequate compensation to Lebanon’s government.
During his speech in Brazil, Mikati also accused Israel of repeatedly contravening U.N. Security Council Resolution 1701 which ended the 2006 war, saying that Israel constantly violates Lebanon’s land, airspace and maritime waters.
“The painful reality of Israel’s refusal to comply with international resolutions is not limited to this environmental case but extends to Israel’s continued occupation of valuable parts of my country: the Shebaa Farms and Kfar Shuba Hills as well as the northern part of Ghajar,” the prime minister said.
He added that Lebanon reserves the right to regain those parts of its territory under Israeli occupation and to stop Israel’s hostile practices via all available means within the framework of international agreements and treaties.
Mikati, who met with Lebanese expatriates in Rio de Janeiro and Sao Paolo, also addressed the U.N.’s program for sustainable development. He said developing countries such as Lebanon require time, technological and financial support as well as international partnership to achieve inclusive and sustainable development. He added that the U.N. program would be unsuccessful if all countries fail to come together.
Mikati also stressed the need to achieve Millennium Development Goals by 2015 to create a roadmap for a better future.
Read more: http://www.dailystar.com.lb/News/Politics/2012/Jun-22/177750-mikati-calls-for-intl-tribunal-to-try-israel-for-2006-lebanon-oil-spill.ashx#ixzz1z5vghGty
(The Daily Star :: Lebanon News :: http://www.dailystar.com.lb)
Fresh water in the Gulf region comes from rain mainly in the winter months, which is also the lowest period of evaporation.
The region's high summer temperatures, and the high evaporation rate make the Gulf water nearly one and a half times more saline than the oceans.
The Gulf's counterclockwise current moves through the
On January 21st, 1991, a few days after the start of the air campaign against Iraq, the Iraqi military in Kuwait opened valves at the Sea Island oil terminal near Kuwait City and released massive quantities of crude oil into the Gulf, as an act of environmental warfare (if we can’t have the oil then neither can you). The oil moved southwards with the current and began to accumulate on the north coast of Saudi Arabia, where it endangered the fragile intertidal zones, mangrove forests and wildlife habitats such as bird feeding grounds and fish and shrimp nurseries.
The first oil was spotted on January 24th the main source of oil appeared to be
As Iraqi troops withdrew from Kuwait at the end of the first Gulf War, they set fire to over 650 oil wells and damaged many more, just south of the Iraq border (yellow line).
The Landsat images left show before, during and after the release of 1.5 billion barrels of oil into the environment, the largest oil spill in human history.
(Credit: NASA's Goddard Space Flight Center)
For the initial two weeks the winds were soft and from the southeast which slowed the oil from moving to the southwest and provided valuable time to prepare for it.
Right Black smoke plumes stream into the skies around Kuwait City in April 1991 five weeks after the fires were set. Credit: NASA's Earth Observator.
The oily plumes extended three to five kilometers up into the atmosphere and hundreds of kilometers across the horizon.
Credit: NASA's Earth Observatory
Left with a change in wind direction this caused problems with the satelite surveilance of the slick as they could not see thought the smoke.
In 1991, Landsat captured the devastating environmental consequences of war. As Iraqi forces withdrew from Kuwait, they set fire to over 650 oil wells and damaged almost 75 more, which then poured crude oil across the desert and into the Gulf. Photos above.
Fires burned for ten months. According to a 2009 study published in Disaster Prevention and Management, firefighting crews from ten countries, part of a response team that comprised approximately 11,450 workers from 38 countries, used familiar and new technologies to put out the fires. When the last one was extinguished in November, about 300 lakes of oil remained, as well as a layer of soot and oil that fell out of the sky and mixed with sand and gravel to form 'tarcrete' across 5 percent of Kuwait's landscape. Emergency responders and scientists in Kuwait used Landsat and other satellite data to locate and monitor the plumes of smoke and burning wells. The three images above from Landsat 5's Thermal Mapper show Kuwait in August 1990 before the fires, June 1991 while the fires were burning, and January 1992, two months after the last fires were put out. In this 3-band composite (7-4-2), Landsat-5’s shortwave infrared band (band 7) easily detected the flames burning at over 1300°F (700-800°C). The fires were so hot that the detectors overloaded temporarily, turning the saturated red dots into saturated lines visible in the June 1991 image.
Subsequent studies used Landsat to look at the before and after effects of the fires and to monitor the changes to the oil lakes over the past 22 years. The lakes are visible in the 1992 image around the area of the former fires.
An estimated one to 1.5 billion barrels of oil were released into the environment. After most burned, 25 to 40 million barrels ended up spread across the desert and 11 million barrels in the Gulf, according to a 2012 paper published in Remote Sensing of Environment.
For comparison, the 2010 Deepwater Horizon spill into the Gulf of Mexico is estimated to have released nearly 5 million barrels of oil. Kuwait's landscape has recovered somewhat. Clean up efforts have removed 21 million barrels of oil from the desert, but an estimated 1 million barrels still remain.
NASA and the U.S. Department of the Interior through the U.S. Geological Survey (USGS) jointly manage Landsat, and the USGS preserves a 40-year archive of Landsat images that is freely available over the Internet. The next Landsat satellite, now known as the Landsat Data Continuity Mission (LDCM) and later to be called Landsat 8, is scheduled for launch in 2013.
One of the disastrous consequences of the 1991 Arabian Gulf War was the burning of oil wells and the subsequent creation of oil lakes.
During the War, Iraqi forces set ablaze 656 active oil producing wells and damaged another 74 for the crude oil to gush freely.
The free-flowing crude oil accumulated and formed a network of oil rever and oil lakes.
Approximately 300 oil lakes of various size covering an area of 49 km2 were bequeathed to kumait's desert environment.
Some of the oil rivers and showed lakes dried up with time to from tarmats, but the rest had become an unwanted addition to kumait's environment. Twenty-one million barrels of oil representing 96% of the oil were recovered and exported by Kuwait oil cooperation (KOC) and Kuwait Petroleum Cooperation (KPC).
The remaining one million barrels are left at the mercy of Kuwait's harsh weather, and are sources of environmental hazards to plants and animals. Serveral rehabilition methods, inciding bioremedition, are under consideration (Balba et al, 1992), but no large-scale techniques for the remedition of the affected area have been implemented
Photo Steve McCurry Ahmadi Oil Fields
A huge amount of equipment and resources were needed to address this disaster. Officials knew, however, that the greatest single problem hindering the well capping efforts was that the Iraqi destruction of the Kuwaiti infrastructure, during the period of occupation, effectively eliminated Kuwait’s capability to undertake a damage control program.
This prompted a massive mobilization of well control resources from around the world. In all, more than 10,000 workers from 37 countries were called in to assist in well control.
Resources necessary to extinguish and cap the wells included: 361 water lagoons, each with a 1 million gallon capacity; 450 km of water piping; and more than 5,000 pieces of heavy equipment. The first of this equipment arrived in country via a military airlift on March 15, 1991.
The first firefighting companies to get involved with the Kuwaiti oil well fires were from North America. These first firefighters were the internationally known "Big Four": Red Adair, Boots and Coots, Safety Boss, and Wild Well Control, Inc. Bechtel, Inc. provided all of the construction and logistical support for the project.
OGE Drilling-Kuwait, Inc. was given the initial responsibility for the coordination of the multiple firefighting teams. Santa Fe drilling company joined in this effort as the number of firefighting teams grew.
These companies began arriving in Kuwait on March 11, 1991 and initiated firefighting activities on March 16, 1991.
After several months of working almost exclusively with the four teams, the Kuwaiti Government reassessed the oil fire situation.
It was determined that due to the slow pace of progress, additional support would be needed. By the end of August, firefighting teams from France, Hungary, China, Iran, USSR, and the UK had joined in the firefighting efforts.
This work also was marked by some excellent photography like this one above left entitled firefighters of Kuwait. It won the Canon award.
By September 1991, the number of firefighting teams in Kuwait had grown to 27. This led to a corresponding increase in the daily average of wells capped per day, from 3 in May 1991, to 8 in October 1991. By October 10th, firefighters had capped 566 of the roughly 750 damaged wells in Kuwait.
Below shows the chronology of well capping and extinguishing.
May 1991 - 140
July 1991 - 265 August 1991 - 350 September 1991 - 500 November 1991 - 750
When you have so many well on fire, people get the opportunity to try new ideas. Below is one of them.
A Hungarian company lashes two MiG engines to a Soviet tank and proceeded to blow out the worst sort of raging oil-well fire.
The water is turned on, the six nozzles above the MiG engines unleashing an immense blast of water that mingles with the jet exhaust and becomes a ferocious spray of steam. The water is moving at a maximum rate of 220 gallons of water a second. (If you hooked up this machine's water pump to a typical suburban swimming pool, it would suck it dry in about 50 seconds.)
The fire is killed by severing the supply of oil to the flame. The first 15 to 30 feet of oil streaming upward from the wellhead doesn't burn because it travels too fast for oxygen to mix with it and ignite.
Cutting through the oil flow with the immense jet exhaust, and the fire dies.
Then the steam cools the air around the well, helping to prevent re-ignition. A spark can restart the inferno, as often happens when oil teams, drenched in gushing oil, are trying to recap a well.
The risk is real, one Romanian team in Kuwait did find itself suddenly engulfed in flames, although the men got out alive, preserving the zero-fatality rate among firefighters.
This unique firefighting tank, which is fondly called "Big Wind" by some and "Windy" by others. The tank is Russian, the owner is the Arab owned Hungarian company MB Drilling, a division of the MB Group of Oman, and it was created in 1991 in a town 50 miles southeast of Budapest.
It is based on a Russian idea. For years, the Soviets had blown out gas- and oil-well fires and cleared snowbound airfields by using a single MiG-15 jet engine bolted onto the bed of a truck.
The Saudi governmental agencies together with oil companies from home and abroad started the difficult task of evaluating the amount and location of the oil using satellite imagery and mathematical models in order concentrate response resources.
In February, 1992, an international team of scientists started a 100 day survey of the Area, mapping the shallow marine habitats around
The team found an asphalt pavement on the beaches of the island as well as along sections of the north of the island.
The asphalt surface was approx. 0.2m thick. This pre-dated the 1991 War and indicated the long term effect on the Gulf.
Saudi Arabia relies on desalinated sea water for its fresh water supply, sea water is also used for the cooling of electric power station and oil refineries.
The object of the Iraqi exercise was to shut down all of these operations.
Fortunately the amount of boom and response personnel protected all of the sea water intakes by deflecting the oil past them.
Abu Ali Island and Ad Daffi Bay which jut out into the Gulf approx. half way down the Saudi coast experienced the greatest pollution, with the main effect of the spill concentrated in the mangrove areas and shrimp grounds.
Large numbers of marine birds, such as cormorants. The beaches around the entire bay shoreline were covered with oil and tar balls.
Many of the mangrove pneumatophore breathing roots became covered with oil resulting in the death of the trees.
In some collection areas the oil was over a meter thick.
Huge quantities of oil were removed and temporarily stored in huge pits built in the sand like this one, to give it scale the trucks on the right bottom are forty foot road tanks.
Much of the liquid oil was re refined while large quantities were used, it was said to stabilise sand dunes in the desert as you can imagine there is no oil to be seen.
A difficult task holding millions of tons of sand against the wind.
Oil Spill Could Block Strait of Hormuz
Iran has denied accusations that its revolutionary armed forces (IRGC) are planning to create an environmental disaster in the Strait of Hormuz and use it to have international sanctions against the country lifted, local media reported on Wednesday, 17 October 2012. The German news magazine Der Spiegel reported on Sunday that it had evidence of a plan by IRGC commander Mohammad Ali Jafari to cause an oil spill to block crude exports through the Strait which are crucial to the global economy.
The report gave no source but said the aim was to "punish" oil-exporting Gulf Arab states hostile to Iran and force the West to request Iranian help in the clean-up, opening the way to a suspension of financial and trade sanctions against the country.
Around 40% of the world's seaborne oil exports pass out of the Gulf via the Strait of Hormuz. Iran has previously threatened to disrupt or close the waterway if its nuclear sites are subjected to military attack by Israel or the United States.
The NATO bombing of Yugoslavia
Code-named Operation Allied Force this military operation against the federal Republic of Yugoslavia lasted from 24 March to 10 June 1999. The bombing of the oil refinery in
The destruction of the factories released approx. 73,000 m3 tons of crude oil of which 90% was incinerated, 560 tons reached the
The dates that refineries were bombed are April 13th, 15th, 18th, 21st, 24th, 27th, and 29th then again on June 8th and 9th.
It is not a big refinery, so why it took so much bombing is beyond me.
On one of these days the river jetties right were bombed with precision, just the ends where the vessels tie up. Incredibly no one working in the refinery died during this time, especially when they were trying to put the fires out.
I can say that the building mentioned by the CIA is on the same street. It looks like the wrong zip code was used.
The Chinese government issued a statement on the day of the bombing that it was a "barbarian act"
Few Chinese politicians believed the US version of events, believing instead the strike had been deliberate.
Former ambassador Li Daoyu stated "we don't say it was a decision of Clinton or the White House", but the Chinese government describes the US explanation for "the so-called mistaken bombing" as "anything but convincing" and has never accepted the US version of events.
On June 9th,
On the 10th June, I arrived in
The following day we went to the
We visited the town of Panchevo chemical plant located 15 kms northeast of
The chemical complex included a fertiliser processing plant, oil refinery, petrochemical plant and a vinyl chloride monomer (VCM) plant among others. Residential buildings are 150 meters away.
The plants stored volumes of ethylene-dichloride (EDC), ethylene, chlorine, chlorine-hydrogen, propylene and vinyl chloride monomers. During NATO attacks on April 18th, these were released into the atmosphere, water and soil and now pose a serious threat to human health, local ecological systems as well as the broader Balkan region. According to Yugoslav estimates, some 70,000 people were endangered locally - poisoned, injured and/or evacuated. Many dead fish were observed 30 kilometres downstream of Pancevo where fishing is now forbidden.
It is estimated that 1,400 tonnes of EDC were released directly into the
Mercury was probably released after destruction of the chlorine-alkaline electrolysis plant where some 100 tonnes of mercury were stored. Fifty tonnes of oil emulsion and more than 100 tonnes of liquid ammonia also leaked into the
Polluted clouds created by the bombing carried the products of combustion of VCMs (phosgene, chlorine, chlorine oxides and nitrogen oxides) as well as ammonia, petroleum and petroleum products. The Pancevo VCM plant was completely destroyed and more than 1,000 tonnes of VCM were released. This plant burned for hours, creating a whitish smoke that moved toward
The Times of
War in this case was necessary as diplomacy was impossible, thousands of people had lost their life and many more lives were at risk. But how many peoples healths have been damaged due to the constant bombing of chemical plants. The unknown environmental damage is more difficult to access as the Danube flows through Serbia, Romania and Bulgaria on its way to the Black sea. With all the contaminants how many fish, birds, animals and humans have died and will die due to this damage.
These fairly rare aerial photos of before, during and after the raid can be seen at full size with right click and save as
The refinery can be found on Google Earth at Latitude 45°27'53.41''N longtitude 19°86'33.14''E.
Here we are 10 years later and the refinery is less than half built.
Texaco in Equador
It is up to you to decide but here are both sides of the argument.
This is the Texaco version from their site.
Texaco Petroleum (Texpet) was minority partner in an exploration and production venture with
At the conclusion of the venture's twenty-year concession, the area and facilities of the former consortium were subjected to a government-supervised audit, which, together with other Government data, became the basis for a settlement agreement under which Texpet was required to conduct environmental remediation with respect to sites in proportion to its one third interest in the venture. To that end, Texpet executed a $40 million remediation and public works program under close GOE supervision; Texpet's remediation was fully inspected, certified and approved by the GOE; and the GOE granted Texpet a full and complete release of all further claims, liabilities and obligations associated with Texpet's operations in Ecuador.
The release documents were signed by GOE's Minister of Mines & Energy, the President of Petroecuador, and the General Manager of Petroproducción--the operational division of Petroecuador. Texpet has had no role whatsoever in exploration and production operations in
Petroecuador, on the other hand, the operator and sole owner of the oil fields for 15 years, never fulfilled its responsibility to remediate its share of the venture's production s
ites and, since Texpet's exit from Ecuador, has compiled an atrocious and well-documented record of environmental neglect and misconduct. The environmental degradation present in
Texaco has been embroiled in a long-standing legal dispute lead by U.S. based contingency-fee trial lawyers working in partnership with NGOs and local activists whose goal is to extort a large financial windfall from Chevron. These lawyers' efforts to bring these cases in
In 1999, seven years after Texpet ceased to have any involvement in the operations in Ecuador, the government of Ecuador enacted a new environmental statute - the 1999 Environmental Management Act ( EMA)- that purports to allow any Ecuadorian resident to file suit for environmental reparations on behalf of the collectivity. While the 1999 EMA created new substantive rights that did not previously exist, the new law cannot be used to challenge pre-1999 conduct,as per Article 7 of the Civil Code of Ecuador, which expressly prohibits retroactive application of Ecuadorian substantive law. Nevertheless, in 2003 the very same
The litigation in
To their credit, the courts in
The initial evidentiary phase of the litigation in
The judicial site inspection process came to a head, with the production of the first and only report submitted by the five independent court-appointed settling experts for the Sacha-53 site. The experts concluded that Texpet's remediation was conducted in accordance with the required parameters and that there is low health risk to humans from oil at that site. That event marked a tuning point in the case and changed the course of the litigation.
Thereafter, the plaintiffs began an intense campaign to abort the evidentiary process and increase the circus of protests designed to bring pressure on the court. They ceased paying their share of court ordered settling expert fees, bringing their work to a standstill. They "waived" the inspection of the remaining 64 sites, while contending that they should still be allowed to claim damages from these un-inspected sites, without first substantiating their claims with proof. And, most importantly, they demanded that the court proceed directly to a liability determination phase and that it appoint a single expert of their choice - not the same settling experts initially appointed by the court - to perform the entire assessment.
With the election of a new government in
In short, this case has now descended into a judicial farce. Chevron is left with no alternative other than to speak openly about the denial of justice that is occurring in
Here is the Chevron Toxico version from their site.
In 1964, Texaco (now Chevron), discovered oil in the remote northern region of the Ecuadorian Amazon, known as the "Oriente." The indigenous inhabitants of this pristine rainforest, including the Cofán, Siona, Secoya, Kichwa and Huaorani, lived traditional lifestyles largely untouched by modern civilization. The forests and rivers provided the physical and cultural subsistence base for their daily survival. They had little idea what to expect or how to prepare when oil workers moved into their backyard and founded the town of Lago Agrio, named for Texaco's birthplace of Sour Lake, Texas. The Ecuadorian government had similarly little idea what to expect; no one had ever successfully drilled for oil in the Amazon rainforest before. The government entrusted Texaco, a well-known
Unlike the Exxon Valdez disaster that spilled over a billion gallons of crude during a one time cataclysmic event, T
exaco's oil extraction system in Ecuador was designed, built, and operated on the cheap using substandard technology from the outset. This led to extreme, systematic pollution and exposure to toxins from multiple sources on a daily basis for almost three decades.
In a rainforest area roughly three times the size of
Here is a nice incriminating memo from the chairman of the board in 1972. I found this at huffingtonpost.com not something that should have been left lying around. Let alone be scanned and put on the internet.
Ecuador plans to sign an agreement today with the United Nations
Development Fund (UNDP) that will open an international trust fund to receive donations supporting the government’s proposal to keep some 900 million barrels of oil in the ground. The heavy crude is found in three oil reserves beneath the fragile Yasuni National Park – the Ishpingo, Tambococha, and Tiputini (ITT).
Three tumultuous years in the making, the deal with UNDP finally spares a significant area of the Park from oil drilling. Initial donor countries include Germany, Spain, France, Sweden, and Switzerland which have collectively committed an estimated US $1.5 billion of the US$3.6 billon that the Ecuadorian government seeks.
The plan will keep an estimated 410 million tons of C02 – the major greenhouse gas driving climate change – from reaching the atmosphere. This precedent of avoided CO2 emissions could factor into future climate negotiations.
In 2007, Ecuador’s President Correa launched the Yasuni-ITT initiative, seeking international financial contributions equaling half of the country’s forgone revenues if the government left Yasuni’s oil reserve untouched.
The proposal seeks to strike a balance between protecting the park and its indigenous inhabitants, while still generating some revenue for Ecuador, a country dependent on oil for 60 percent of its exports. Covering nearly 2.5 million acres of primary tropical rainforest at the intersection of the Andes and the Amazon close to the equator, Yasuni is the ancestral territory of the Huaorani people, as well as two other indigenous tribes living in voluntary isolation, the Tagaeri and the Taromenane.
As a result of its unique location, Yasuni is an area of extreme biodiversity, containing what are thought to be the greatest variety of tree and insect species anywhere on the planet. In just 2.5 acres, there are as many tree species as in all of the US and Canada combined.
“We welcome this long sought after final step to protect an important part of Yasuni National Park,” said Kevin Koenig, Amazon Watch Ecuador Coordinator who has been closely monitoring the initiative since its inception. “This is a big win for Ecuador, and the world. Now we need more countries to contribute, and for President Correa to keep his word.”
The landmark proposal was an uncertain three years in the making, and on several occasions appeared dead in the water. From the outset, the government insisted on a one-year deadline to raise close to $4.5 billion, which was viewed as an impossibility by potential donors and undercut the proposal’s perceived viability. Political turnover led to three different Foreign Affairs ministers and three distinct negotiating teams, while the government implemented seemingly contradictory environmental policies that continued to allow drilling inside the park and expanded mining concessions
throughout the Amazon.
Correa’s public rebuke of his negotiating team after the Copenhagen Climate Summit were the trust fund was originally set to be signed, led to the resignation of the entire team as well as the Foreign Minister and confidant, Fander Falconi.
But Ecuador’s civil society organizations, as well as the Huaorani themselves, kept the proposal alive by pressuring the government and continuing to increase the proposals popularity nationally and internationally.
The environmental organization, _Acción Ecológica_ with its “Amazon For Life” campaign collected tens of thousands of signatures of support and kept the initiative in the news during times when the government’s commitment appeared to wane. The Huaorani continued to raise their voices on the importance of the park, the perils of oil extraction, and the need to keep out extractive industries from areas where the nomadic Tagaeri and Taromenane are present.
Although there is cause for celebration, some of Ecuador’s indigenous groups are concerned by the Correa administration’s announcement this week to open up areas of Ecuador’s roadless, pristine southeastern Amazon region, as well as re-offering older oil blocks that were unsuccessful due to indigenous resistance.
“We hope that the success of the Yasuni proposal doesn’t mean a defeat for the forests and people of the southern rainforests,” said Marlon Santi, President of the powerful national indigenous confederation CONAIE. “We don’t want Correa to offset his lost income from leaving the ITT oil in the ground by opening up other areas of equally pristine indigenous lands.”
A new report has uncovered 90 oil spills by Pluspetrol in northern Peru's Amazon rainforest over the past 3 years. Covering two oil blocs—1-AB and 8—the report, complied by the Federation of Indigenous Communities of the Corrientes River (FECONACO), recorded 18 major oil spills in just the last year.
"A week after the landmark ruling against Chevron in Ecuador for $9 billion of damage from operations in the 1970's and 80's, this new report highlights the ongoing devastation caused by the oil industry on the fragile Amazon ecosystem and the people that live there," said Atossa Soltani, Executive Director at Amazon Watch, in a press release.
In June of last year a tanker spilled 400 barrels of oil into the Maranon River, which led to a blockade where indigenous protested called for Pluspetrol to pay them compensation for the pollution in the form reforestation, food, medicine, and cash payments.
Using community monitoring of oil operations along the Corrientes River, the report also documents over 90 contamination sites left from over previous oil operator Occidental Petroleum that were not made apart of a clean-up agreement taken on by Pluspetrol. For its part Occidental Petroleum is currently embroiled in a lawsuit brought to court by members of the indigenous tribe Achuar for contaminating the region.
Peruvian health studies have found that 98% of Achuar children have high levels of cadmium in their blood, and two-thirds suffer from lead poisoning.
"[The report] raises serious concerns about Peru's aggressive development strategy to open the Amazon to oil drilling," said Gregor MacLennan, Amazon Watch Peru Program Coordinator, also in a press release.
The government of Peru, led by President Alan Garcia, is currently pushing an oil boom. Around 70% of the Peruvian Amazon has been opened for oil and gas exploration and drilling, and a number of foreign companies have heard the call, including Talisman Energy, Petrolifera, ConocoPhilips, and Hunt Oil.
The conflict between indigenous people living the region and big oil turned violent in 2009. A standoff between indigenous protestors and government police ended with 23 police officers and at least 10 protesters dead, though indigenous people say that bodies of protesters were dumped in rivers to hide the numbers killed.
Chevron used secret lab to hide dirty soil samples from ecuador court, say company documents
NEW YORK -- In an ever more stunning expose of Chevron's fraud before the Ecuador court, a U.S. federal judge has ordered the disclosure of documents that demonstrate Chevron used a secret lab in the United States to hide the existence of dirty soil samples taken from the company's contaminated former well sites in the Amazon.
The documents also show that Chevron's scientific experts in the Ecuador trial -- one of whom is a respected professor at the University of California -- executed a scheme that guaranteed the company would find only 'clean' soil samples from contaminated well sites while all 'dirty' samples would be sent to a lab called NewFields, where they would not be disclosed to the court.
The existence of the NewFields lab, which is based in Atlanta, was not disclosed by Chevron to either the plaintiffs or the Ecuador trial court before it ruled in February that the company was liable for $18 billion in clean-up damages. Even though Chevron tried to present a false picture of the evidence to the court, the Ecuador judge found that scientific samples from the plaintiffs and other court-appointed experts clearly demonstrated extensive pollution at all of the 94 former Chevron well sites and production stations inspected during the trial.
Chevron executed its deceptive sampling plan by secretly and unilaterally pre-inspecting well sites in the days before court-supervised judicial inspections of the same sites, which were attended by both parties and the judge. Chevron used the pre-inspections to plot areas on ground higher than the contaminated waste pits where soil samples would come up 'clean' during the official inspections process. See here and here.
As a general matter, the documents show that only Chevron's 'clean' soil samples were submitted to the Ecuador court despite rampant pollution on the ground and in streams and rivers near all Chevron well sites that were inspected by the parties during the trial, which lasted from 2003 to 2011. As an example, see this photo of Shushufindi 38, a former Chevron well site where Chevron in contrast to the plaintiffs reported that it found no contamination in its soil samples.
Other documents (here and here) show Chevron committed fraud by lying to some of its own technical experts so they would laud the company's deceptive sampling practices even though they were designed to mislead the court.
Lawyers for the rainforest communities immediately submitted the new documents – one called 'The Judicial Inspection Playbook' and written by a Houston-based environmental consulting firm -- to the Ecuador appellate court that will determine whether to uphold the $18 billion judgment against Chevron for discharging billions of gallons of oil-laced toxic waste into the Amazon rainforest, decimating five indigenous groups and causing an outbreak of cancer. The judgment was handed down on February 14 after an eight-year trial that produced 220,000 pages of evidence.
The new documents were not part of the evidence presented to the Ecuador trial court. U.S. Magistrate Judge Michael E. Hagarty in August 2011 ordered them disclosed as part of a discovery action in Colorado against Bjorn Bjorkman, a Chevron expert. They were included in a legal filing last week made before a New York federal judge. See here for all the documents.
'The stunning 11th-hour disclosure of these in-house documents clearly proves Chevron went through a meticulous planning process to defraud the Ecuador court and in fact defrauded the Ecuador court in a systematic way during the judicial inspections process,' said Pablo Fajardo the lead Ecuadorian lawyer in the case.
'The document also closes the loop on what we long suspected -- that Chevron's scientists were systematically hiding from the court the existence of extensive contamination at all of Chevron's former well sites,' he added.
Completed in 2006 by Chevron experts at GSI Environmental in Houston, 'The Judicial Inspection Playbook' indicates that during the trial Chevron planned to hide or minimize the extent of the toxic threat at each of its 378 former well sites and production stations. Dozens of those sites were inspected during the trial, with soil and water samples being submitted to laboratories for analysis with the results becoming part of the main body of evidence relied on by the court.
The newly disclosed documents demonstrate that:
The Ecuador court never received lab results from NewFields, which markets its ability to help corporations manage human rights violations involving contamination. 'Clean' samples were sent to the Severn Trent lab, Chevron's laboratory of record during the trial but one that also has come under attack for not being independent.
Evidence also emerged that Chevron altered the 'Judicial Inspections Playbook' document to remove references to parts of its deceptive sampling plan before giving it to Douglas M. MacKay, Ph.D, a Chevron expert who teaches at the University of California at Davis. Based on the altered plan, MacKay was induced by Chevron to submit a robust defense of Chevron's sampling plan to the Ecuador court -- a blatant act of fraud by Chevron, according to the plaintiffs.
In his submission to the Ecuador court, MacKay and two other experts, Pedro J. Alvarez, Ph.D and Robert E. Hinchee, Ph.D, concluded 'there is no foundation for the serious allegations … that [Chevron's] sampling program deliberately hides or minimizes the existing contamination.' The allegation has been made by the plaintiffs in a report submitted by their own U.S. technical experts, Dr. Ann Maest and Bill Powers.
'Chevron's decision to withhold this information from the Ecuadorian court, to defend its otherwise indefensible sampling methodology, and to submit expert reports that rely on altered documents is a fraud on the Ecuadorian justice system,' read a brief filed recently by the plaintiffs before a New York federal court in a related matter.
The Chevron 'playbook' for the judicial inspections instructed the company's experts that 'locations for sampling should be chosen to emphasize clean points around pits'. Chevron also directed its experts to 'collect soil samples at 4 or more locations surrounding the site, using locations the PI (Pre-Inspection) team has shown to be clean.'
Chevron also created individual 'playbooks' for each site to be inspected by the court, based on its undisclosed pre-inspection visits. For example, the playbook for the Sacha North Production Station indicates that of three borings Chevron made during its pre-inspection, one afforded Chevron an acceptable 'delineation point' to return to at the subsequent court inspection. The others showed or tested positive for contamination.
During the trial, Chevron issued multiple press releases defending the integrity of its sampling process, all of which contained false information, said Karen Hinton, the U.S. spokesperson for the Ecuadorian plaintiffs.
Chevron's manipulation of sampling evidence is also consistent with statements made by Chevron contractor Diego Borja that he would swap out contaminated samples collected from judicial inspection sites with clean samples collected at other locations to send to the supposedly independent Severn Trent Laboratory. Borja testified that the Severn Trent Laboratory actually 'belonged to Chevron' and was directed by Borja's wife, Sara Portilla.
The Ecuadorians called on MacKay, Alvarez and Hinchee to disavow their report in light of the new evidence, said Hinton.
“Chevron duped Dr. MacKay and the other experts,' she said. “We therefore urge them to recant their findings and immediately notify the Ecuador appellate court.”
The new information also increases the pressure on John Conner, Chevron's lead U.S. technical expert during the Ecuador trial. Conner, the lead partner at GSI Environmental, was paid an estimated $8 million by Chevron for his work in Ecuador and is thought to be the main author of the 'Judicial Inspection Playbook' document.
As Chevron's main technical witness in the Ecuador case, Connor's credibility has taken several serious blows as of late and he could be sanctioned for participating in the oil giant's scheme in Ecuador, said Hinton. Last year, Conner was the main Chevron witness at a trial in Mississippi where a jury rejected his scientific analysis and decided in favor of the plaintiffs.
Conner is now Chevron's main technical witness in a private international arbitration action that the oil giant hopes will shift the $18 billion liability to Ecuador's government. Without his testimony, Chevron's prospects in that action certainly look dim, said Hinton.
A list of some of Chevron’s judicial inspection experts, all of whom were presumably guided by the protocols in the 'Playbook', included (in addition to Connor): Ernesto Baca, Gino Bianchi, Fernando Morales, Jorge Salcedo, Bjorn Bjorkman, Gregory Douglas, Charles Newell, Jimmy Kirkland, Les Oakes, Thomas McHugh, Burton Suedel, Van Ekambaram, Mala Pattanayek, Bridgette DeShields, Lloyd Deuel, Raymond C. Loehr, Marcelo Muñez, and Gerardo Barros.
Chevron Brasil 2011
Brazil is temporarily banning the American company, Chevron, from drilling for oil in its territory.
The National Petroleum Agency (ANP) said it would suspend Chevron's activities in Brazil until it had established the cause of an oil spill off the coast of Rio de Janeiro. Chevron has apologised for the leak, but has stressed it acted as rapidly and safely as possible to contain it. The Brazilian government has fined Chevron $28m (£18m) for the spill. Brazilian Environment Minister Izabella Teixeira said Chevron could face further fines if an investigation into the spill revealed more infractions.
ANP also rejected a Chevron request to drill a deeper well in the Frade field in order to reach sub-salt fields, which could hold reserves of more than 100bn barrels of high-quality recoverable oil. It said such drilling would "pose risks to the environment similar to those that occurred in the well where the spill occurred, but bigger and magnified by the greater depth".
The head of Chevron's Brazil operation, George Buck, appeared before the lower house of the Brazilian parliament to apologise for the leak. He said the company respected Brazil and the Brazilian people, its environment, laws and institutions.
"We are going to thoroughly investigate the accident and present the results to the Brazilian people... so that this does not happen again either here or in any other part of the world," Mr Buck said. Brazilian authorities said the spill was now under control and the oil slick had been reduced to two square kilometres.
ANP said the leak released between 200 and 330 barrels a day at the height of the spill. The head of the ANP, Haroldo Lima, said the accident was "serious, but not major".
He said there was "no comparison" between this spill and last year's disaster at BP's Macondo well in the Gulf of Mexico, where 11 people died and about 3,000 barrels a day were leaked. In recent years Brazil has discovered billions of barrels of oil in deep water that could make it one of the wold's top five producers.
This is why people like Chevron have come to Brasil, to exploit yet another so called third world country.
Facing sharp criticism from Brazilian officials, senior management of Chevron Brazil said that Chevron takes “full responsibility” for an oil spill off the southeastern coast of Brazil that was discovered on November 7. George Buck, Chevron’s chief operating officer in Brazil, told reporters on Sunday that Chevron “takes full responsibility for this incident,” and said that “any oil on the surface of the ocean is unacceptable to Chevron.” The oil spill began when an undersea well operated by Chevron succumbed to pressure from the oil reservoir, allowing crude to escape through a breach in the bore hole wall and up through the ocean floor. According to Brazil’s National Petroleum Agency, up to 110,000 gallons of oil may have leaked into the Atlantic Ocean. On uThursday, Chevron capped the well with cement, but oil is reportedly still leaking from cracks in the seabed. Buck said that storms and ocean swells prevented Chevron cleanup boats from reaching the oil slick for two days after the leak was discovered, but they are now skimming the ocean surface to clean up the spill. Coming on the heels of a long legal battle with Ecuador over contamination in the rainforest, Chevron employees may face $5.5 million in fines and potential prison time in Brazil, according to the environmental minister of Rio de Janeiro state.
Now lets look at the responsibility Chevron is taking for the clean up.
So here we are at ground zero as some people like to call it, there are supposed to be 16 ships collecting, recovering and mechanically dispersing the oil.
Heres one right but needs to be a bit closer to the oil to do any good!
Here is a boom between two ships just a little question where is the skimmer or is this mechanical dispersion Chevron style.
So as you can see nothing changes there are rules at home an no rules when working in other parts of the world.
I can even lay a bet that if the Brasilian government were to fine Chevron on the same scale as the US did to BP then the US government would defend Chevron!
Seeing as the rig was owned by Transocean know doubt the other major players in Deep water horizon were also involved and it looks like they are trying to get their act together at the cost of another country then they do deserve a considerablbly higher fine than they have recieved to date..
Chevron is revered in Wall St. and City of London for its massive abilities as a money machine. Last year Chevron, the United States’ largest oil and gas company after ExxonMobil, boosted its revenues by an impressive 25% over FY 2010 to $245.6 billion. Of even greater interest to Chevron shareholders, profits soared by 41% to $26.9 billion. Little wonder then that Chevron CEO and chairman John Watson strolled home with roughly $25 million in total compensation in 2011, a 52% increase over his 2010 pay, according to Chevron's securities filing.
Brasil bites back
Kenneth Rapoza 3/21/2012
It’s not easy being Chevron. The BP of Brazil faces a round of civil and criminal charges so steep that the company’s spokesman in California, Kurt Glaubitz, called them “outrageous and without merit” on Wednesday.
Chevron faces a whopping $11 billion in civil damages and its president in Rio, George Buck, could face upwards of 31 years in prison for spilling 2,400 barrels of oil far off the coast of Rio de Janeiro in early January. The spill took roughly four days to clean from the surface of the Atlantic, but as of last week tiny droplets of oil were still seeping from the well in Chevron’s Frade field, located in the oil rich Campos Basin.
As a result of the spill, Brazil’s National Petroleum Agency fined the company $20 million. That’s million with an M compared to the billion with a B that the state prosecutor of Rio has levied against the California-based oil major. As oil spills go, Chevron is being charged for murdering the Girl from Ipanema…with a water gun.
No oil washed up on Rio or Espirito Santo beaches, but the Brazilian government is taking no chances. The last thing it wants is a blowout in a deep sea oil well that turns Copacabana into the Gulf of Mexico circa 2010, especially when the country is hosting the World Cup in 2014 and the Summer Olympic Games in 2016. For what it’s worth, Brazil is policing those waters religiously. No one believes they should do otherwise.
The problem for Chevron is that they are paying dearly for sins committed in those holy waters.
BP's blowout in the Gulf of Mexico in April 2010. A volcano of oil claimed human lives, and was the worst environmental disaster the Gulf of Mexico ever witnessed. BP still drilling in the Gulf.
By comparison, BP’s Gulf of Mexico disaster spilled five million barrels of oil. The company was fined the equivalent of $1,200 per barrel while Chevron is being fined the equivalent of around $3.6 million per barrel. BP was forced to set aside $20 billion to pay for damages to Gulf Coast businesses. Around $5 billion has been paid out so far. BP estimated it would cost about $41 billion in the weeks after the explosion to account for all of its costs, including cleanup, compensating businesses, and paying fines and ecological damage. If the Rio lawsuit was won in total, Chevron would be paying about half the civil damages BP paid for a spill that was almost routine by comparison.
A crack in the ocean floor caused by a miscalculation by Chevron drillers off the coast of Rio in November 2011. Oil seeps from the Frade field well. Chevron is suspended from all drilling activity in Brazil and may even have to leave the country.
Click on photo left to see video
Not that anyone should be taking oil spills lightly. Chevron has had run ins with governments for questionable environmental stewardship in the past, most recently with a controversy in Ecuador to which the company escaped harsh penalties but did not escape the bad publicity.
Chevron’s facing the same problem now in Brazil, though most of the criticism is coming from state attorneys in Rio.
“Once all the facts are fully examined, they will demonstrate that Chevron and its employees responded appropriately and responsibly to the incident. Chevron will vigorously defend the company and its employees,” said Glaubitz. “Chevron has collaborated transparently and completely with all the appropriate Brazilian government authorities.”
The public prosecutor’s office stated in a press release that it has also requested the confiscation of Chevron and its executives assets, plus bail of R$1 million ($555 million) for each individual and R$10 million for Chevron. Transocean (RIG) was also charged with civil and criminal liabilities in the spill. If sentenced, the bail will serve to pay indemnity for damages, fines and legal fees.
It looks like oil spills in 3rd world countries won't be tolerated anymore. It was probably easier for BP to close a well in than for Chevron to sort out a crack in the sea bed.
Transocean will appeal the decision on suspension in Brazil
A federal court in Rio de Janeiro on Thursday issued a notice against the oil company to halt all operations in Brazil within 30 days
Zurich - The Swiss Transocean oil group, specializing in oil exploration offshore, said on Friday it would appeal the by a Brazilian court to suspend activities in the country in the next 30 days, a decision which Transocean opposes "vigorously ".
The decision was taken after the leak of 3,000 barrels of oil off the coast of Rio de Janeiro in November 2011 at the Frade field in the Campos Basin.
The company claims that it's defense will be "vigorous" against the ruling and would appeal to a higher court.
Transocean has 10 oil rigs under contract in Brazil. The group activity in the country represented 11% in the first half of 2012 of a total turnover of 4.9 billion dollars.
By Mario Sergio Lima and Maria Luiza Rabello
Transocean Brazil Ban Said to Hinder Petrobras Output Growth
Petroleo Brasileiro SA (PETR4)’s plan to boost oil production is being threatened by a court ruling that bans drilling contractor Transocean Ltd. (RIG) from operating in Brazil, said a government official with knowledge of the matter.
State-run Petrobras, which runs fields producing more than 90 percent of Brazil’s oil and gas, is affected because it hired Switzerland-based Transocean to drill 24 wells that would boost output by 240,000 barrels a day, said the official, who declined to be named because he isn’t authorized to speak publicly about the matter. Petrobras, based in Rio de Janeiro, produced 1.95 million barrels a day last month, down from 1.97 million a year earlier, according to its website.
Petrobras, based in Rio de Janeiro, produced 1.95 million barrels a day last month, down from 1.97 million a year earlier, according to its website. Photographer: Dado Galdieri/
The court dispute is threatening Petrobras’s attempt to increase domestic production after posting a second-quarter loss of 1.35 billion reais ($665 million), the first in more than a decade. Petrobras is investing about $236 billion in the five years through 2016 to more than double oil output by 2020 and expand gasoline production.
Petrobras is closely following the legal case and awaits a final ruling to make further comments on the matter, the company said in an e-mailed response to questions.
7 of the 10 these rigs are contracted to Petrobras.
20 January 2012, Sweetcrude, LAGOS - Crude oil spill has been reported from the fire which hit the oil drilling rig, KS Endeavor, early Monday morning offshore Nigeria, with two dead.
The rig, working for Chevron Nigeria Limited, is now partially submerged but continues to burn on Block 86 in the Funiwa field.
Director general of the Nigerian National Oil Spill Detection and Response Agency (NOSDRA), Peter Idabor, said some community leaders in Bayelsa State have complained that oil from the accident was already ashore and polluting the environment.
This is also based on a report from NOSDRA’s deputy director, who was part of a helicopter fly over the burning rig together with officials of the Department of Petroleum Resources (DPR) and Chevron on Wednesday.
Idabor said: “A crude oil spill from the facility was spotted by the surveillance around the KS Endeavor and along the shoreline,” adding: “This is a very serious explosion. You have drilling fluids and oil seen around the rig itself.”
He stated that complaints have been received by his agency from government officials in some parts of Bayelsa state about pollution washing ashore.
“There are several communities already impacted,” he claimed. “The first one is Koloma towns 1 and 2, the second one is Fishtown and the third is Frupa.”
On Tuesday Chevron had confirmed that “a small sheen was visible in close proximity to the (affected) well,” estimating the sheen at 13 barrels.
Another bad day for Chevron
It looks like there is a company policy for working at home and another for working abroad. It is much cheaper to have oil spills outside the USA!! Just as well, seeing as they are in the bids for the next round of drilling in the Arctic.
The Chevron Toxico logo still fits and will do until they clean up their act.
Nigeria on a normal day
It is estimated that an Exxon Valdez equivalent spill happens every year in Nigeria and most of it is in the delta region.
This is without doubt the worst place I have ever visited.
Bureaucracy and corruption meets you at Lagos airport on arrival at passport control where there is a notice behind the officials which reads "do not bribe the officials" who's first words are "do you have a present for me?".
As in all corrupt countries it starts at the top and penetrates through all the officials.
Nigeria is the land of over 250 tribes. The oil rich Niger Delta belongs to 4 or 5 but the government is made up of different ones and of course they do not live in the delta either.
The Nigerian government is the principal share holder of all of the major upstream companies operating in Nigeria. They own 55% of Shell Nigeria, 60% of Agip, 60% of Mobil and 60% of Chevron operations in the country.
The money earned by the government over the last 50 years finds its way to places like
It is not difficult to understand the thinking in the Delta, with the oil flowing in the main in surface pipelines through the Delta region.(photo below right)
The people get some money from Shell by drilling holes in the pipelines or opening valves sometimes even using explosives to steal the oil (known as bunkering) or tocause a pollution problem for which they then require compensation. This is paid by Shell not the Swiss banks.
The explanation for a hole in one crude line which was on the top of the pipe with the steel bent inwards was corrosionwe were told it, it looked more like an explosion as corrosion usually occurs under the pipe, but you don’t argue with the man with the AK47 Kalashnikov.
It is quite a common event for someone to hole a gasoline line then everyone is in line with anything that will hold liquid, from time to time there are huge fires during these incidents it is not uncommon for hundreds of people to die or be badly burn.
The photo left is the result of a gasoline explosion and fire that killed 200 people.
When all your countries wealth is running past your door and you have nothing I suppose it is hard not to try and get something.
The gas flares in the delta region are usually in big pits; the locals cook cassava part of the local diet here (photo left) they usually have black spots made by oil that passes the flare, not very healthy.
In recent years a various ethnic militia groups calling themselves the Movement for the Emancipation of the Niger Delta (MEND), Niger Delta People's Volunteer Force (NDPVF) and Niger Delta Vigilante (NDV) have been taking hostage oil workers and damaging the oil infrastructure e.g. Terminals, pipeline, valves and rigs.
As with all of the worlds terrorist organisations recruiting people, raising money and buying arms for the cause is not difficult. The arms in many cases are better than the army and police have.
Homemade barges leaking stolen crude oil Refineries burning and pollutingthe area
There are few negotiations for these groups to stop. In the mean time how many people kidnapped, die and how much damage is done to both the oil infrastructure and the environment.
This link take you to youtube for the Shell video about ilegal refineries http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=jXeTw11fVpU#!
Here are a couple of photos of the refinery areas unfortunately money for a few destroys the environment for eveyone.
The government has said recently “We are losing almost 180,000 barrels of oil per day to criminals. If you reflect back that the total amount of crude being produced per day in Ghana and which sustains the whole country is about 120,000 barrels, yet, as a nation, we lose more than that to criminals."
Dependent on who you are and where you live, depends on who you call a criminal.
This of course will continue until the Delta Region gets something for what they think is their oil or the government stops being corrupt. I guess it will be a while!
Pakistan border with Afganistan
One of many attacks on NATO fuel supplys for the War in Afganistan
Pakistanis watch the burning NATO supply oil tankers following an attack by gunmen on the main highway at Kolpur village, 25 kilometres south of Quetta, the capital of restive Baluchistan province on August 22, 2011.
Militants torched at least 19 oil tankers near Dasht tehsil of Mastung on Monday. The tankers were carrying fuel for US-led North Atlantic Treaty Organisation (NATO) forces in neighbouring Afghanistan.
“A convoy of NATO oil tankers was attacked by armed motorcyclists when the vehicles were parked on the Quetta-Sibi national highway and awaited security clearance late on Saturday night,” police official Ismail Kurd said.
“Thirteen oil tankers were completely burnt, six partially damaged while seven others remained safe,” Kurd said, adding that there were no human casualties.
Provincial Home Secretary Zafarullah Baloch also confirmed the attack.
Police cordoned off the entire area immediately after the attack and started searching for the assailants.
There was been no immediate claim of responsibility for the attack however similar attacks have been carried out by Taliban militants in the past to disrupt supplies to US-led troops fighting against the militia in Afghanistan for the past 10 years.
These convoys seem to be a good source of fuel for some of the local population as well. This could turn out like the theft in Nigeria with many people being either killed or burned badly.
The Indian Sub Continent
Alang and Chittagong Ship Wreckers
She was the longest ship ever constructed, longer than many of the world's tallest buildings are tall including the
With these dimensions she was unable to navigate the
Below 14 May 1988, Hormuz Terminal, "Seawise Giant" on fire after the Iraqi Air-attack during the Iraq/Iran war.
As a tanker she also was known as the, Happy Giant, and Jahre Viking.
In 2004, she was renamed Knock Nevis, and converted into a Floating storage tanker (FSO) moored in the Qatar, Al Shaheen oil field in the Arabian Gulf.
So what do you do with a ship like this when her working days are done?
In December 2009, the vessel was sold to Indian breakers and renamed
After clearing Indian customs, she was then intentionally beached at Alang,
Photo of Mont 29/03/2010 at Alang (www.midshipcentury.com 2010) Here is a photo before she disappears
A big ship needs a big anchor and they don't come bigger than this it weights 36 tonnes with 20 links of chain, is 7m long in the shank, 4.45m across the flukes and 1.13m thick.
Gifted to the Hong Kong Maritime Museum by an anonymous donor, it waits for approval from the Central and Western District Council and other stakeholders for its proposed placement near the Central “Star” Ferry Piers as a monument to many generations of Hong Kong seafarers and port workers.
Left is an artists impression of the anchor in front of the museum.
This photo below is from Google Earth of 10 kilometers of the coast at Alang, India
Just to give you an idea of what goes on in Alang here are a few photos. The ships are run aground at high tide and taken apart with gas axes and man power, of course the oil in there tanks is not completely removed as can be seen below. These people are used to that.
You can only imagine with the price for scrapping ships the best in the world due mainly to the cheap labour used, there are more and more ships being sent there to cause more and more pollution.
This link will show more close up photos http://connect.in.com/alang-ship-breakers/photos-1-1-1-e03b95b357b4a7ae01ecccbf1948cdd4.html
It is getting difficult to hide from Google Earth when you know where to look. Below is the Sitakundu coast near Chittagong, Bangladesh here it is only a stretch of coast 8.5 kms that is used. At the end is where the mangroves try to survive.
Debate over Cause of Oil Spill Near Ship Destruction Yards
A 10-kilometre oil slick has been reported in the Bay of Bengal off the Sitakunda upazila area in Bangladesh. Boatmen and passengers crossing the area in the morning said they had noticed the strip, which was around 50 feet wide and spreading to Kadam Rasul from the Kumira coast. Both the reason for and the severity of the spillage so far remain unconfirmed.
A ferry operator on the sea route noticed black burnt oil floating on the surface. Boatmen, fishermen and people travelling between Sandwip and Chittagong said they often see oil spills, for which they blame the ship-demolishing industry. There are over 50 ship destruction yards next to the coast and more than 100 vessels are beached there for dismantling.
Hefazatur Rahman, president of Bangladesh Ship Breakers' Association, brushed aside the suggestion that scrap ships caused oil spills in the sea. Oil might have leaked from tankers that travel to different parts of the country from the Chittagong port, he said.
An Environment department director from the port city said they had inspected the area in the afternoon and noticed no major spill. They saw a 100-metre layer of oil floating between Kadam Rasul and Kumira, but could not identify its source, he said.
Image Courtesy: SPOT Image/ Google Maps
Just to show how some people live with oil pollution as a daily occurrence below is a satelite photo of an Indian oil field. The white dots are oil platforms where as the black areas are oil slicks which happen daily. without satelites know one outside would know!
My controversy over the flow rate from Deepwater Horizon Spill 2010
A tale of two blow outs.
In a bid to win the world series of oil spills it comes as no surprise that the Deepwater Horizon spill is now said to be the biggest marine accident in the world.
I would like to put the case that it was actually smaller than Ixtoc 1.
The fact is that there is no factual basis for these figures, they are known as a guesstimates.
The total amount from Deepwater Horizon (DWH) is said to be 4,100,000 - 4,300,000 barrels.
When the spill began supposedly when the rig sank on
After many years in this industry a rule of thumb in the early hours of a spill is to add one more zero to the figure therefore making it 10,000 bpd. Outside scientists quickly produced higher estimates.
Official estimates increased from 1,000 to 5,000 barrels per day (160 to 790 m3/d)
On April 29, to 12,000 to 19,000 barrels per day (1,900 to 3,000 m3/d)
On May 27, to 25,000 to 30,000 barrels per day (4,000 to 4,800 m3/d)
On June 10, and to between 35,000 and 60,000 barrels per day (5,600 and 9,500 m3/d),
On July 15, 3 months later, the leak was stopped by capping the well. It was then estimated that 53,000 barrels per day (8,400 m3/d) were escaping from the well just before it was capped. It was believed that the daily flow rate diminished over time, starting at about 62,000 barrels per day (9,900 m3/d) and decreasing as the reservoir of hydrocarbons feeding the gusher was gradually depleted.
Official estimates were provided by the Flow Rate Technical Group—scientists from USCG, (NOAA), (DOE), and outside academics, led by (USGS). The later estimates were believed to be more accurate because it was no longer necessary to measure multiple leaks, and because detailed pressure measurements and high-resolution video had become available. According to BP, estimating the oil flow was very difficult as there was no underwater metering at the wellhead and because of the natural gas in the outflow. The company had initially refused to allow scientists to perform more accurate, independent measurements, saying that it was not relevant to the response and that such efforts might distract from efforts to stem the flow. Former Administrator of the EPA Carol Browner and Congressman Ed Markey (D-MA) both accused BP of having a vested financial interest in downplaying the size of the leak in part due to the fine they will have to pay based on the amount of leaked oil. So obviously there had to be a big increase in the flow rate.
http://www.oilspillhub.org has a collection of over 400 videos taken from ROV's at the well head. You can guess too!
Here are some photos of the shoreline in
The total amount from Ixtoc 1 is said to be 3,329,000–3,520,000 barrels.
In the case of Ixtoc 1 which on June 3, 1979, the 2 mile deep exploratory well, blew out in the Bahia de Campeche, 600 miles south of Texas in the Gulf of Mexico.
The platform collapsed into the wellhead area hindering any immediate attempts to control the blowout.
In the initial stages of the spill, an estimated 30,000 barrels of oil per day were flowing from the well.
In July 1979 the pumping of mud into the well reduced the flow to 20,000 barrels per day
In August the pumping of nearly 100,000 steel, iron, and lead balls into the well reduced the flow to 10,000 barrels per day until it was finally capped 11 months later on
Prevailing northerly currents in the western
On August 6,15 and 18,1979, tarballs from the spill impacted a 17 mile stretch of
On August 24, mousse impacted shoreline south of
By August 26, most of
On September 1, the entire south
Ultimately, 71,500 barrels of oil impacted 162 miles of
Here are some photos of the shoreline in
A few simularities:
It seems very strange to me that both these oil spills were of large proportions and the both oils emulsified, one was 41 miles off the coast while the other was 600 miles away yet the shoreline impact was worse from the Ixtoc 1 than DWH. Therefore in my opinion there was more oil from Ixtoc 1 than from DWH.
It looks like, what Tony Hayward said "I think the environmental impact of this disaster is likely to be very, very modest," along most of the coastline was probably right.
To go back to the world series statement at the start, it now becomes obvious why the figures have been manipulated to be the supposed biggest marine accident to date. It has now been decided that BP will pay US$1,500 per barrel so the more you up the figure the more the fine becomes.
One thing is for sure, the cost will get into the Guinness Book of Records. BP said in November that the cost of the oil spill had risen to $11.6 billion. Total costs are expected to reach about $40 billion, including $20 billion set aside for compensation payments in an agreement signed with the US government. Costing more than all the past oil spills on earth since World War 2. Cynically paying most of the bank bailout money!
It has taken until Feb 2012 to find the disparacy in quantities across the different articles about DWH.
We now have a difference between 454,000 - 480,000mt for Ixtoc 1 and 77,000 - 250,000mt for DWH of course the fines will be based on the highest.
As I said Ixtoc 1 was worse than DWH which ever way you look at it.
The United Kingdom
Legacy of the Torrey Canyon
Taken from an article by Patrick Barkham The Guardian, Thursday 24 June 2010
Britain's worst-ever oil spill in 1967 was handled disastrously, is still killing wildlife today 46 years later.
The sound of a bird's wings batting futilely against the gloopy blanket of black oil echoes across the quarry. Then there is silence. A pigeon has crashed into this dark pool, 100 metres from the turquoise sea on the west coast of Guernsey. It sinks within seconds, resurfaces for a final flap, then joins the other small carcasses lying face down in the swirls of black slime.
Since 1967, this deadly, oil-filled crater on the Chouet headland has acquired a new name: Torrey Canyon quarry.
On the morning of Saturday 18 March 1967, the Torrey Canyon ran aground on Pollard's Rock between Land's End and the Isles of Scilly. Over the following days, every drop of the 119,328 tonnes of crude oil borne by this 300m-long supertanker seeped into the Atlantic. Thousands of tonnes despoiled the beaches of Cornwall – and thousands more were propelled by winds and currents across the channel towards France.
A dead bird in Torrey Canyon quarry on Guernsey, which is still full of oil from the 1967 spill. Photograph: Graeme Robertson
Nineteen days after the disaster, a huge slick hit western Guernsey. The oil lay so thick that 3,000 tonnes could be pumped directly into sewage tankers. 'We've got to clear our beaches, we're a tourist destination, right, there's a quarry, let's put it there.
' It was a decision that had to be made very quickly," says Rob Roussel of Guernsey's public services department. Roussel remembers the oil on the island's beaches as a boy; he is now in charge of cleaning up Torrey Canyon quarry.
Moving oil to the quarry was a solution that created another problem. This dirty legacy of the Torrey Canyon has refused to disappear. "It stinks.
Torrey Canyon quarry, Guernsey. Photograph: Graeme Robertson
Everybody's known about it but no one has wanted to do anything about it," says Jayne Le Cras, director of operations at the Guernsey Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals. "Because of its thickness and stillness birds see it as a solid surface, they land on it and then the weight of the oil holds them down. I would hate to know how many are underneath it."
A family of kestrels is nesting in the quarry wall and short-eared owls breed in adjacent pines trees. When passing walkers hear the flapping of stranded birds they alert the GSPCA but staff can't always reach the quarry quickly enough to rescue birds. Last autumn, a GSPCA officer filmed a pigeon struggling in the oil on his phone and posted it on Facebook. The resulting furore helped prompt the authorities into action again.
Guernsey's government says it has spent thousands trying to clean up the quarry. It was cleared in the 80s; more recently, 160,000 litres were taken to a processing plant in Hull. But each time the oil has been removed more has seeped from the sediment below, which cannot be dug out because the quarry was a German armaments dump when they occupied the island during the second world war. Last year, the water level rose and the changing pressure released more crude from the bottom. "The company that was responsible for the Torrey Canyon should be paying for it under the polluter-pays principle but the international laws weren't in place back then," says Roussel.
Meanwhile, long after the disaster had slipped off the front pages, Hosking remembers balls of oil, like giant Maltesers, washing up on Marazion's beach: "At the time we thought, 'This is it.' This is Cornwall messed up for the rest of our days. My first thought was, how the hell are they going to get rid of this lot? Mother nature is a very powerful thing. Eventually, I expect nature did most of it."
In Guernsey, in 2010, the authorities are also now trying to remove the last of the Torrey Canyon oil in an environmentally friendly way. Last month, they began to pump micro-organisms into the oily water, which is aerated by a small generator running 24 hours a day. This process of "bioaugmentation" uses naturally occurring bacteria for whom oil is a food source to break down the oil. The government predicts that the rapidly multiplying micro-organisms will have eaten the oil by the end of the year. Does Le Cras think it will work? "Proof is in the pudding, isn't it?" she says. "I hope everything they say comes true. It will be a great day for us when it happens."
Read the full article at: http://www.guardian.co.uk/environment/2010/jun/24/torrey-canyon-oil-spill-deepwater-bp#ixzz2UhLQnJCB